Make it happen!

contribute now
 
 

Columbia River Coal Comments Most in DEQ History

Aug. 26, 2013 | Northwest Public Radio
CONTRIBUTED BY:
Courtney Flatt

AUDIO:

Alternative content

Download Audio


Related Articles

  • Protest organizers held what they dubbed a "people's hearing" outside the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality meetings in Portland. Resident Mark Hill said the department is not looking at the bigger picture. credit: Cassandra Profita
  • Commentors sign up for a time slot at public meetings in Hermiston, Ore. The state Department of Environmental Quality held a day-long public meeting in eastern Oregon and in Portland to take people's comments in person. credit: Courtney Flatt
Protest organizers held what they dubbed a "people's hearing" outside the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality meetings in Portland. Resident Mark Hill said the department is not looking at the bigger picture. | credit: Cassandra Profita | rollover image for more

Oregon environmental regulators have been sifting through more than 16,000 comments about a proposed coal export terminal along the Columbia River, after the public comment period recently closed.

The input - most of it critical of the Morrow Pacific Project - came in by e-mail, in person, over the phone and by fax.

Spokesman Greg Svelund said this project has generated the most public comments in the history of the department.

“We’re breaking new ground, yes. Certainly for a public comment, I don’t think anything really comes close to this,” Svelund said.

The Oregon Department of Environmental Quality is deciding whether to issue three permits for the terminal. For Ambre Energy to move forward with the project it must be granted stormwater, air and water quality permits for an enclosed terminal it plans to build in Boardman, Ore.

The proposed export terminal would transport coal from the Powder River Basin by rail to the eastern Oregon town of Boardman. From there, it would barge about nine million tons of coal down the Columbia River to Port Westward. It would then be shipped to Asia.

Public comments on the project ranged from support for jobs to concerns about climate change. Roughly 80 percent of the comments opposed the project. Most comments came in from groups. Of all the comments the department received, about 500 were from individuals.

Next, Svelund said, the department will respond to comments that specifically address the project’s permits.

The permits the department is considering do not cover many of the concerns environmental groups have raised. Speakers have expressed frustration during public meetings at the limited scope of the three permits.

The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is overseeing the environmental review for the Morrow Pacific Project, along with two other proposed coal export terminals in the Northwest. (The corps this summer announced it would not consider the region-wide effects of the proposed coal terminals.)

Columbia Riverkeeper announced Monday that it is suing the corps to gain access to documents pertaining to why the corps decided to not conduct a full environmental impact statement for the Morrow Pacific Project. The corps decided last fall to instead conduct an environmental assessment, which environmental groups say is a less thorough review.

© 2013 Northwest Public Radio
Morrow Pacific environment NW coal Morrow Pacific Project coal comments
blog comments powered by Disqus



Share your experiences as part of EarthFix's Public Insight Network.